Ugly Rug, Sins of a Diarist, Shocking Shoes
An arms control specialist I know once told me, “If there were a nuclear war, the only things left alive would be cockroaches, Fidel Castro and Keith Richards.”
I inadvertently acquired the World’s Most Hideous Rug this week from an eBay seller for $49.99, shipping included. The pictures on the site did not do it justice. Instead of a friendly floral in muted shades of pink and pale spring green on a cream-colored background, it turned out to be a garish mélange of fuchsia, orange, avocado and camel. And it stank of chemicals, though it was guaranteed (the seller had perfect feedback) to be pure wool. Just ghastly.
I decided to add my rug (liberally treated with Febreeze, which can work miracles on odors, but sadly not on colors) as a “filler” item to the estate sale I am currently working. I should be able to get my money back--possibly make some, besides. Among the items I’ve discovered while clearing out bedroom furniture for the sale is a small spiral-bound notebook, a diary. The first lines from one entry are representative of the whole:
August 21, 1969. Woke up and talked to Angela. Ate breakfast and got dressed.
Fascinating stuff, no? The stuff of which Pulitzer Prize-winning prose is made. A vivid illustration of the incredible inanity of everyday life. Like the Facebook status updates that Gene Weingarten ranted about in a recent Washington Post column.
Let’s exegete the diarist’s multiple compositional sins, shall we? First, waking is understood; to declare that one attained normal consciousness is to begin the day effectively redundant. Why bother getting out of bed? Now, if there had been elaboration (e.g. awoke “unable to breathe”, “after only fifteen minutes of sleep”, “to the smell of smoke”) that might have made the mention worthwhile. Secondly, who was Angela? What was the content of the conversation? Did the writer even need to be conscious to interact with her? Thirdly, whereas proper nutrition cannot be overvalued, the mere act of feeding one’s face isn’t pertinent without context: did it consist of snails and puppy-dog tails? Did chewing and swallowing occupy exactly three minutes and twenty-seven seconds? And lastly, given that swanning around in one’s birthday suit is generally frowned upon by polite society, why bother saying that you dressed if you don’t describe how, or in what you were attired?
As to clothing nudity, while I was searching Amazon.com for my required bridesmaid silver heels, I discovered that they list a wide range of what I call “streetwalker shoes”: Lucite platforms that tower eight inches off the ground, thigh-high black PVC boots, red leather bondage sandals, kitten-heeled boudoir slippers festooned with dyed feathers. They really aren’t that expensive, either….
I inadvertently acquired the World’s Most Hideous Rug this week from an eBay seller for $49.99, shipping included. The pictures on the site did not do it justice. Instead of a friendly floral in muted shades of pink and pale spring green on a cream-colored background, it turned out to be a garish mélange of fuchsia, orange, avocado and camel. And it stank of chemicals, though it was guaranteed (the seller had perfect feedback) to be pure wool. Just ghastly.
I decided to add my rug (liberally treated with Febreeze, which can work miracles on odors, but sadly not on colors) as a “filler” item to the estate sale I am currently working. I should be able to get my money back--possibly make some, besides. Among the items I’ve discovered while clearing out bedroom furniture for the sale is a small spiral-bound notebook, a diary. The first lines from one entry are representative of the whole:
August 21, 1969. Woke up and talked to Angela. Ate breakfast and got dressed.
Fascinating stuff, no? The stuff of which Pulitzer Prize-winning prose is made. A vivid illustration of the incredible inanity of everyday life. Like the Facebook status updates that Gene Weingarten ranted about in a recent Washington Post column.
Let’s exegete the diarist’s multiple compositional sins, shall we? First, waking is understood; to declare that one attained normal consciousness is to begin the day effectively redundant. Why bother getting out of bed? Now, if there had been elaboration (e.g. awoke “unable to breathe”, “after only fifteen minutes of sleep”, “to the smell of smoke”) that might have made the mention worthwhile. Secondly, who was Angela? What was the content of the conversation? Did the writer even need to be conscious to interact with her? Thirdly, whereas proper nutrition cannot be overvalued, the mere act of feeding one’s face isn’t pertinent without context: did it consist of snails and puppy-dog tails? Did chewing and swallowing occupy exactly three minutes and twenty-seven seconds? And lastly, given that swanning around in one’s birthday suit is generally frowned upon by polite society, why bother saying that you dressed if you don’t describe how, or in what you were attired?
As to clothing nudity, while I was searching Amazon.com for my required bridesmaid silver heels, I discovered that they list a wide range of what I call “streetwalker shoes”: Lucite platforms that tower eight inches off the ground, thigh-high black PVC boots, red leather bondage sandals, kitten-heeled boudoir slippers festooned with dyed feathers. They really aren’t that expensive, either….
